On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Scott England-Sullivan <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> What was the final outcome on this?  Is Karaf-2.3.x going to be based on
> OSGi 4.3?
>

Karaf 2.3.x is laready using OSGi 4.3


>
> Needing to know if I should update the Karaf 2.3.x SCR bundles to the Felix
> DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT which has the 4.3 support in it.
>
> Best Regards,
> Scott ES
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Freeman Fang <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > +1 for Andreas's first plan.
> >
> > Freeman
> > -------------
> > Freeman Fang
> >
> > FuseSource
> > Email:[email protected]
> > Web: fusesource.com
> > Twitter: freemanfang
> > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> > http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> > weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
> >
> > On 2012-8-18, at 下午1:19, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> >
> > > TBH I personally would rather prefer:
> > >
> > > - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
> > > - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
> > > - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 4.3.0
> > > - Karaf 4.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
> > > - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
> > > - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
> > >
> > > I know that both options are not really optimal, but I don't think
> > > that we really want to upgrade the inner core of the entire thing to
> > > the next major version in a minor of Karaf. There where some API
> > > changes from a user lvl of view which disallow to drop the same bundle
> > > into a 4.2/4.3 environment and a 5.0. I do not really fancy the idea
> > > of breaking compatibility between minor releases. If ppls setup break
> > > from one minor to the next they lost trust and upgrade ways too late
> > > although there should be no reason.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> Hi team,
> > >>
> > >> As you know, OSGi core 5.0.0 has been released.
> > >>
> > >> I would like to discuss about which version of Karaf should support
> > which
> > >> version of the OSGi core (and so the corresponding OSGi frameworks).
> > >>
> > >> I have the following proposal:
> > >>
> > >> - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
> > >> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
> > >> - Karaf 3.0.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
> > >> - Karaf 3.1.x => OSGi core 5.0.0
> > >>
> > >> I would wait Karaf 3.1.x to update to OSGi core 5.0.0 as the OSGi
> > frameworks
> > >> are not yet fully ready on this specification.
> > >>
> > >> WDYT ?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >> --
> > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> --
> Scott England-Sullivan
> ----------------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web:     http://www.fusesource.com
> Blog:     http://sully6768.blogspot.com
> Twitter: sully6768
>



-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to