Just a question. ASM has a BSD based license. So what is a problem to re-package it with the "org.apache.karaf." prefix in package names and keep it as some kind of "internal" dependency? In the case any karaf-based application can use their version of ASM and karaf will use its own. No "magic" reflection is needed for it.
-- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/ASM-version-tp4026185p4026199.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
