Personally, I would love to see this change and the other people in my organization liked the proposal as well.
- Eric L On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 3:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Some of you already pinged me to share concerns about PAX projects > governance. I think it's my duty to share these concerns and discuss > possible actions. > > Apache Karaf is one of the biggest consumers of PAX projects. > > However, PAX projects use a "self own" designed governance: > - for contribution/IP > - for release > - for CVE/Security > - ... > > And it could be seen as a major concern for Apache Karaf users, as PAX > projects are not necessarily "aligned" with Apache Foundation rules. > > I would like to start a discussion on both Karaf and OPS4J communities > to "move" PAX projects as Karaf subproject (like karaf-pax). > Concretely, it would mean that: > 1. Karaf PAX projects would use org.apache.karaf.pax namespace > 2. Karaf PAX releases will have to follow the Apache release process > (binding votes, 3 days vote period, ...) > 3. Any active contributor on PAX projects would be invited as Karaf > committer > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB >
