On 01/16/2018 09:43 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 19:26 +0100, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> Hi there, fellow Apache projects! >> >> The Apache Kibble project serves as a practical implementation of >> metrics deemed to be helpful for open source projects trying to >> understand where their project is, was, and is headed. >> >> As such, we need help in determining which metrics projects either >> already use and consider useful for measuring project health or which >> metrics they would love to have and use. >> >> We are looking for projects interested in participating in the Kibble >> demo instance ( https://demo.kibble.apache.org/ ) and sending >> feedback >> to the Kibble project on which parts they find useful, which elements >> they find useless and which ideas they would love to see implemented >> to >> better gauge the health and activity of their project. > > I would be interesting in gathering information about the Apache Sling > project. Now, I'm aware that we might be a bit special, having in > access of 250 projects ( canonical listing at [1] ), so I won't be > shocked if you reject or delay our inclusion.
The actual number of repos is somewhat of a moot factor - what really matters is the code size and activity. I've been doing some timed scans on the demo server, and I think we can safely bump the resource object count to 600-700 without any real difficult (note that this would still only be about an 1/8th of all of ASF). If someone wants to add Sling, go right ahead :) > > We are interested in Kibble since we have split our source repositories > which makes it hard to generate aggregate statistics of our development > activity. For me personally the most important indicators to track > would be the number of distinct contributors over the last X months, > which is a fair indicator of community engagement. > > Thanks, > > Robert > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/sling-aggregator/blob/master/default.xml >
