dev  

Messages by Date

• 2025/04/04 Re: [DISCUSSION][WORKFLOW] SpringBoot support for data index and job service Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/04 Re: [DISCUSSION][WORKFLOW] SpringBoot support for data index and job service Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/04 Re: [PROPOSAL] Coordinating PatternFly 5 Upgrade Effort Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/04/04 Re: [DISCUSSION][WORKFLOW] SpringBoot support for data index and job service Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/04 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Alex Porcelli
• 2025/04/04 Re: [DISCUSSION][WORKFLOW] SpringBoot support for data index and job service Pere Fernandez (apache)
• 2025/04/04 Re: [PROPOSAL] Coordinating PatternFly 5 Upgrade Effort Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/04/04 [DISCUSSION][WORKFLOW] SpringBoot support for data index and job service Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• 2025/04/03 Re: [PROPOSAL] Coordinating PatternFly 5 Upgrade Effort Tiago Bento
• 2025/04/03 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Yeser Amer
• 2025/04/02 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan ricardo zanini fernandes
• 2025/04/02 Re: [PROPOSAL] Coordinating PatternFly 5 Upgrade Effort Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/04/02 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Jason Porter
• 2025/04/02 Re: [PROPOSAL] Coordinating PatternFly 5 Upgrade Effort Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/04/02 Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE Default Guidelines Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/02 Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE Default Guidelines Gabriele Cardosi
• 2025/04/02 Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE Default Guidelines Toni Rikkola
• 2025/04/01 Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE Default Guidelines Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Martin Weiler
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Gabriele Cardosi
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Pere Fernandez (apache)
• 2025/04/01 Re: Broken kogito-runtimes build due to python modules Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/01 Re: Broken kogito-runtimes build due to python modules Alex Porcelli
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Gabriele Cardosi
• 2025/04/01 [PROPOSAL] Coordinating PatternFly 5 Upgrade Effort Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Alex Porcelli
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Alex Porcelli
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Gabriele Cardosi
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Alex Porcelli
• 2025/04/01 Re: [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Gabriele Cardosi
• 2025/04/01 [DISCUSSION] Continued Support for Infinispan Alex Porcelli
• 2025/04/01 Re: Broken kogito-runtimes build due to python modules Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/01 Re: Broken kogito-runtimes build due to python modules Alex Porcelli
• 2025/04/01 Re: Broken kogito-runtimes build due to python modules Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/01 Re: Broken kogito-runtimes build due to python modules Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/04/01 Re: Broken kogito-runtimes build due to python modules Jan Šťastný
• 2025/04/01 Broken kogito-runtimes build due to python modules Jan Šťastný
• 2025/03/28 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add a new WAITING state Pere Fernandez
• 2025/03/28 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add a new WAITING state Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/03/28 [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE Default Guidelines Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add a new WAITING state Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add a new WAITING state Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add a new WAITING state Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• 2025/03/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add a new WAITING state Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/03/27 [PROPOSAL] Add a new WAITING state Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/03/27 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/27 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Tibor Zimányi
• 2025/03/26 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/03/26 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/26 Anyone in NA interested in Community over Code in Sept? Jason Porter
• 2025/03/26 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/26 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Jan Šťastný
• 2025/03/26 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Jan Šťastný
• 2025/03/26 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Gonzalo Muñoz
• 2025/03/26 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Jan Šťastný
• 2025/03/25 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Jan Šťastný
• 2025/03/25 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Luiz Motta
• 2025/03/25 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Jan Šťastný
• 2025/03/25 Re: [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/25 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS ricardo zanini fernandes
• 2025/03/25 [URGENT] PR checks doesn't work Tibor Zimányi
• 2025/03/24 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Jason Porter
• 2025/03/24 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Deepak Joseph
• 2025/03/24 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/03/24 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Gabriele Cardosi
• 2025/03/24 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• 2025/03/24 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Yeser Amer
• 2025/03/24 Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Pere Fernandez (apache)
• 2025/03/24 [PROPOSAL] Upgrade to Quarkus 3.20 LTS Tibor Zimányi
• 2025/03/19 Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE ByLaws Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/18 [DISCUSSION] On the proposal "Including Docs, Examples, and Website(s) in Apache KIE 10.1 and beyond" Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/18 Re: Status of proposals? Dominik Hanak
• 2025/03/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Tiago Bento
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Kennedy Bowers
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Kennedy Bowers
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Kennedy Bowers
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Thiago Lugli
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Yeser Amer
• 2025/03/17 Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE ByLaws Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/16 Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE ByLaws Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/03/16 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/03/15 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/03/15 [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/15 Re: Hibernate is now ASLv2! Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/15 Hibernate is now ASLv2! Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/14 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Jason Porter
• 2025/03/14 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Pere Fernandez (apache)
• 2025/03/14 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/14 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/14 Re: [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main Tibor Zimányi
• 2025/03/14 Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE ByLaws Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/13 [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE ByLaws Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/11 Status of proposals? Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Tiago Bento
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Toni Rikkola
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/03/11 Re: Status of proposals? Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/07 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] - Adding DbMigrator Image to Dockerhub ricardo zanini fernandes
• 2025/03/03 Re: [DISCUSSION] ruleflow kjar use case Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• 2025/03/03 Re: [DISCUSSION] ruleflow kjar use case Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/03 Re: [DISCUSSION] ruleflow kjar use case Alex Porcelli
• 2025/03/03 Re: Podling Kie Report Reminder - March 2025 Jason Porter
• 2025/03/02 Re: [DISCUSSION] ruleflow kjar use case Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• 2025/03/02 Re: [DISCUSSION] ruleflow kjar use case Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/03/02 Podling Kie Report Reminder - March 2025 jmclean
• 2025/02/28 Re: [DISCUSSION] ruleflow kjar use case Mark Proctor
• 2025/02/27 Re: [DISCUSSION] ruleflow kjar use case Alex Porcelli
• 2025/02/26 Re: [DISCUSSION] ruleflow kjar use case Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/02/26 [RESULT][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Tiago Bento
• 2025/02/26 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Tiago Bento
• 2025/02/25 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Dominik Hanak
• 2025/02/24 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Rodrigo Antunes
• 2025/02/21 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Luiz Motta
• 2025/02/21 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] - Adding DbMigrator Image to Dockerhub Dominik Hanak
• 2025/02/21 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] - Adding DbMigrator Image to Dockerhub Gabriele Cardosi
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Pere Fernandez
• 2025/02/20 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Martin Weiler
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards ricardo zanini fernandes
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] - Adding DbMigrator Image to Dockerhub Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] - Adding DbMigrator Image to Dockerhub Tiago Bento
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] - Adding DbMigrator Image to Dockerhub Alex Porcelli
• 2025/02/19 [PROPOSAL][VOTE] - Adding DbMigrator Image to Dockerhub ricardo zanini fernandes
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Paolo Bizzarri
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Dominik Hanak
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Yeser Amer
• 2025/02/19 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Kennedy Bowers
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Eduardo Cerqueira
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Jason Porter
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Jason Porter
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Tiago Bento
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Martin Weiler
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Pere Fernandez (apache)
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Alex Porcelli
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Tibor Zimányi
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Matteo Mortari
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• 2025/02/18 [PROPOSAL] Add support information to website Alex Porcelli
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Thiago Lugli
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Tiago Bento
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Tibor Zimányi
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Toni Rikkola
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Toni Rikkola
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Bincy A B
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Toni Rikkola
• 2025/02/18 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Kennedy Bowers
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Yeser Amer
• 2025/02/17 Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Alex Porcelli
• 2025/02/17 [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Removing `build-chain`, the custom Jenkins framework, and structuring the codebase in a duo-repo setup for 10.2 onwards Tiago Bento
• 2025/02/14 Re: To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images ricardo zanini fernandes
• 2025/02/14 [RESULT][VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Toni Rikkola
• 2025/02/14 Re: [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Toni Rikkola
• 2025/02/12 Re: To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images Massimiliano Dessì
• 2025/02/12 Re: To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images Pere Fernandez
• 2025/02/12 Re: To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/02/12 RE: To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images Jason Porter
• 2025/02/12 Re: To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images Rishiraj Anand
• 2025/02/12 Re: To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images Roberto Oliveira
• 2025/02/12 Re: To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images Alex Porcelli
• 2025/02/12 To archive https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images ricardo zanini fernandes
• 2025/02/12 Re: [PROPOSAL] Use of Docker Hub Mirrors Gonzalo Muñoz
• 2025/02/11 Re: [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Jan Šťastný
• 2025/02/11 Re: [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Toshiya Kobayashi
• 2025/02/11 Re: [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Tiago Bento
• 2025/02/11 Re: [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Jason Porter
• 2025/02/11 Re: [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Rodrigo Antunes
• 2025/02/11 Re: [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Dominik Hanak
• 2025/02/10 Re: [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Alex Porcelli
• 2025/02/10 [VOTE] Community guideline to define discussion, proposal and vote Toni Rikkola
• 2025/02/10 Re: [PROPOSAL] Use of Docker Hub Mirrors Pere Fernandez (apache)
• 2025/02/10 Re: [PROPOSAL] Use of Docker Hub Mirrors Dominik Hanak
• 2025/02/07 Re: [PROPOSAL] Fix missing documentation for 10.0.0 Jason Porter
• 2025/02/07 Re: [PROPOSAL] Allow configuration of outgoing kafka topic in sprinboot Jason Porter
• 2025/02/07 Re: [PROPOSAL] Fix missing documentation for 10.0.0 Gabriele Cardosi
• 2025/02/07 Re: [PROPOSAL] Fix missing documentation for 10.0.0 Fabrizio Antonangeli
• 2025/02/07 Re: [PROPOSAL] Fix missing documentation for 10.0.0 Pere Fernandez (apache)
• 2025/02/07 Re: [PROPOSAL] Fix missing documentation for 10.0.0 Yeser Amer
• 2025/02/06 Re: [PROPOSAL] Fix missing documentation for 10.0.0 Toshiya Kobayashi

• Earlier messages
• Later messages