dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE 10 Release Manager change Dominik Hanak
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache KIE 10 Release Manager change Kris Verlaenen
• Meeting notes from the weekly community meeting Tibor Zimányi
• [DISCUSSION] Purpose of kogito-examples Tibor Zimányi
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Purpose of kogito-examples Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Purpose of kogito-examples Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Purpose of kogito-examples Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Purpose of kogito-examples Jason Porter
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Purpose of kogito-examples Gabriele Cardosi
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Purpose of kogito-examples Kris Verlaenen
• Moving kn-plugin-workflow from incubator-kie-tools to incubator-kie-kogito-serverless-operator Dmitrii Tikhomirov
  • Re: Moving kn-plugin-workflow from incubator-kie-tools to incubator-kie-kogito-serverless-operator Alex Porcelli
• [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Luca Molteni
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow ricardo zanini fernandes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Jason Porter
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • RE: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • RE: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • RE: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Rodrigo Antunes
  • Re: [HEADS UP] Release automation for the Apache KIE 10 release will be triggered tomorrow Alex Porcelli
• [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service Fabrizio Antonangeli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service Jason Porter
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service Fabrizio Antonangeli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service ricardo zanini fernandes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service Fabrizio Antonangeli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service ricardo zanini fernandes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service Fabrizio Antonangeli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Webapps for Data Index and Job Service Jason Porter
• [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Tibor Zimányi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone nicolas.heron
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Tibor Zimányi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Tibor Zimányi
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Martin Weiler
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone ricardo zanini fernandes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone ricardo zanini fernandes
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Gabriele Cardosi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Jason Porter
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Thiago Lugli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Jason Porter
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Gabriele Cardosi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Jason Porter
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Making individual kogito-examples standalone Tibor Zimányi
• [DISCUSS] Kogito Examples and Properties Jason Porter
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Kogito Examples and Properties Roberto Oliveira
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Kogito Examples and Properties Tiago Bento
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Kogito Examples and Properties Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Kogito Examples and Properties Gabriele Cardosi
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Kogito Examples and Properties Jason Porter
• [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Tibor Zimányi
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Tibor Zimányi
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Jason Porter
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Kris Verlaenen
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Kris Verlaenen
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform? Kris Verlaenen
• [DISCUSS] Shall we keep fixing kogito-pipelines issues? Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Shall we keep fixing kogito-pipelines issues? Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Shall we keep fixing kogito-pipelines issues? Jan Šťastný
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Shall we keep fixing kogito-pipelines issues? Toshiya Kobayashi
• [VOTE] - SonataFlow Logo - Last Iteration: colors!! ricardo zanini fernandes
  • Re: [VOTE] - SonataFlow Logo - Last Iteration: colors!! ricardo zanini fernandes
• [DISCUSSION][WORKFLOW] transactions among subsystem when non transactional clients are involved Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
• [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Pere Fernandez (apache)
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Tibor Zimányi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • RE: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Martin Weiler
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Jason Porter
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Human Tasks subsystem Yeser Amer
• [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Pere Fernandez (apache)
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Tibor Zimányi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Jason Porter
  • RE: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Martin Weiler
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Kris Verlaenen
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Kris Verlaenen
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL][WORKFLOW] Transaction in workflow runtime Yeser Amer
• [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Gabriele Cardosi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Tiago Bento
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Tiago Bento
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Jason Porter
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce build sheriffs to monitor and Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
• [REVIEW] Red Hat headers on KIE Tools Luiz Motta
  • Re: [REVIEW] Red Hat headers on KIE Tools Walter Medvedeo
• [DISCUSSION] SonataFlow operator publication in the OperatorHub Walter Medvedeo
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] SonataFlow operator publication in the OperatorHub Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] SonataFlow operator publication in the OperatorHub Walter Medvedeo
• [DISCUSS] Removing SonataFlow images and operator from `kie-tools` Tiago Bento
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing SonataFlow images and operator from `kie-tools` Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing SonataFlow images and operator from `kie-tools` Walter Medvedeo
• [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the kogito 10.x jobs Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the kogito 10.x jobs Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the kogito 10.x jobs Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the kogito 10.x jobs Toshiya Kobayashi
• [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the optaplanner 10.x jobs Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the optaplanner 10.x jobs Jan Šťastný
  • Re: [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the optaplanner 10.x jobs Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the optaplanner 10.x jobs Luca Molteni
  • Re: [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the optaplanner 10.x jobs Luca Molteni
  • Re: [REVIEW] [NOT OK] Current status for the optaplanner 10.x jobs Luca Molteni
• [REVIEW] Current status for the drools 10.x jobs Paolo Bizzarri
• [QUESTION] Operator images in from 10.0.x branch for release Walter Medvedeo
  • Re: [QUESTION] Operator images in from 10.0.x branch for release Tiago Bento
  • Re: [QUESTION] Operator images in from 10.0.x branch for release Walter Medvedeo
• [CHECK]Verification of automation A for kie-tools Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [CHECK]Verification of automation A for kie-tools Rodrigo Antunes
• [HEADS UP] 10.0.x branches will be created today Tiago Bento
  • Re: [HEADS UP] 10.0.x branches will be created today Jan Šťastný
  • Re: [HEADS UP] 10.0.x branches will be created today Rodrigo Antunes
• [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Thiago Lugli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Fabrizio Antonangeli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Fabrizio Antonangeli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Dominik Hanak
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Thiago Lugli
  • [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Jakub Schwan
  • [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Jakub Schwan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sonataflow Operator and related packages for the Apache KIE 10 release Thiago Lugli
• [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Tiago Bento
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Gabriele Cardosi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Tibor Zimányi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Pere Fernandez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Thiago Lugli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Rodrigo Antunes
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Jozef Marko
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Create 10.0.x branches on Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 Luiz Motta
• [DISCUSS][architecture] knowledge around Jenkins and kogito-pipelines Toshiya Kobayashi
  • Re: [DISCUSS][architecture] knowledge around Jenkins and kogito-pipelines Paolo Bizzarri
  • Re: [DISCUSS][architecture] knowledge around Jenkins and kogito-pipelines Tiago Bento
• [HEADS-UP] accidental cut-off messages in Zulip Jan Šťastný
  • Re: [HEADS-UP] accidental cut-off messages in Zulip Jason Porter
• [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Walter Medvedeo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Jason Porter
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Walter Medvedeo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Walter Medvedeo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Walter Medvedeo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Walter Medvedeo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Walter Medvedeo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Alex Porcelli
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Workflow/Process definition availability Alex Porcelli

• Earlier messages
• Later messages