That's great!

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Following my own idea, here is a demo with the Knox / pac4j support:
> https://github.com/pac4j/knox-pac4j-demo
> Feel free to submit pull requests if you want me to amend it.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks.
> Best regards,
> Jérôme
>
>
> 2016-01-18 11:03 GMT+01:00 Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's great news!
> >
> > One more thing I'm thinking of: we always have a demo corresponding to a
> > pac4j support. It would be great to have a knox-pac4j-demo and reference
> it
> > from the manual. I can handle it.
> >
> > Does it make sense?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Best regards,
> > Jérôme
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-01-17 6:37 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> KNOX-641 and KNOX-642 have both been committed to master.
> >>
> >> There is a new docs book where you can check out the pac4j docs
> available:
> >>
> >>
> http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-0-8-0/user-guide.html#Pac4j+Provider+-+CAS+/+OAuth+/+SAML+/+OpenID+Connect
> >>
> >> I have some additional ideas for the docs that I will roll out in the
> next
> >> few days.
> >>
> >> We need to discuss the identity assertion approach for 0.8.0.
> >>
> >> I think we are on track for 1/29 release date.
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to