Hmmmm...

I think that providing appropriate templates (see the templates directory
in the knox install) for both the knoxsso.xml (instead of idp.xml) and
sandbox.xml to reflect the same config would provide the same value and be
self contained without the need to keep the binaries up to date in the demo
with each release.

There is probably value in a blog for early access to pac4j provider demo
that could point to the demo.


On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote:

> Should we add a link in the documentation to point to the demo?
>
> 2016-01-19 14:19 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>:
>
> > That's great!
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Following my own idea, here is a demo with the Knox / pac4j support:
> > > https://github.com/pac4j/knox-pac4j-demo
> > > Feel free to submit pull requests if you want me to amend it.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Best regards,
> > > Jérôme
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-01-18 11:03 GMT+01:00 Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > It's great news!
> > > >
> > > > One more thing I'm thinking of: we always have a demo corresponding
> to
> > a
> > > > pac4j support. It would be great to have a knox-pac4j-demo and
> > reference
> > > it
> > > > from the manual. I can handle it.
> > > >
> > > > Does it make sense?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Jérôme
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2016-01-17 6:37 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > >> KNOX-641 and KNOX-642 have both been committed to master.
> > > >>
> > > >> There is a new docs book where you can check out the pac4j docs
> > > available:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-0-8-0/user-guide.html#Pac4j+Provider+-+CAS+/+OAuth+/+SAML+/+OpenID+Connect
> > > >>
> > > >> I have some additional ideas for the docs that I will roll out in
> the
> > > next
> > > >> few days.
> > > >>
> > > >> We need to discuss the identity assertion approach for 0.8.0.
> > > >>
> > > >> I think we are on track for 1/29 release date.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to