Trying to figure out how to specify the client_name for a given authentication attempt when there are multiple mechanisms defined in the topology. What I had in mind was providing a couple links to login with:
Login with Okta Login with Twitter Login with Google and at the end of each url I thought that I could just indicate &client_name=SAMLClient and that it would choose the SAML config in the topology. That doesn't seem to be how it works - either I am missing something or we need a JIRA to fix something. Can you provide a little more insight into the client selection feature? Thanks! On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:11 AM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmmmm... > > I think that providing appropriate templates (see the templates directory > in the knox install) for both the knoxsso.xml (instead of idp.xml) and > sandbox.xml to reflect the same config would provide the same value and be > self contained without the need to keep the binaries up to date in the demo > with each release. > > There is probably value in a blog for early access to pac4j provider demo > that could point to the demo. > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should we add a link in the documentation to point to the demo? >> >> 2016-01-19 14:19 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>: >> >> > That's great! >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Following my own idea, here is a demo with the Knox / pac4j support: >> > > https://github.com/pac4j/knox-pac4j-demo >> > > Feel free to submit pull requests if you want me to amend it. >> > > >> > > What do you think? >> > > >> > > Thanks. >> > > Best regards, >> > > Jérôme >> > > >> > > >> > > 2016-01-18 11:03 GMT+01:00 Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]>: >> > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > It's great news! >> > > > >> > > > One more thing I'm thinking of: we always have a demo corresponding >> to >> > a >> > > > pac4j support. It would be great to have a knox-pac4j-demo and >> > reference >> > > it >> > > > from the manual. I can handle it. >> > > > >> > > > Does it make sense? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks. >> > > > Best regards, >> > > > Jérôme >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > 2016-01-17 6:37 GMT+01:00 larry mccay <[email protected]>: >> > > > >> > > >> KNOX-641 and KNOX-642 have both been committed to master. >> > > >> >> > > >> There is a new docs book where you can check out the pac4j docs >> > > available: >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> http://knox.apache.org/books/knox-0-8-0/user-guide.html#Pac4j+Provider+-+CAS+/+OAuth+/+SAML+/+OpenID+Connect >> > > >> >> > > >> I have some additional ideas for the docs that I will roll out in >> the >> > > next >> > > >> few days. >> > > >> >> > > >> We need to discuss the identity assertion approach for 0.8.0. >> > > >> >> > > >> I think we are on track for 1/29 release date. >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
