Hi all, Since the 1.0.0 release there have been a few issues found which may warrant a bug fix on the 1.0.x line. I'd like to get the ball rolling and figure out what we might want to include in a bug release, if we decide to go ahead with a bug release fix.
Potential inclusions: KUDU-1652 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1652>: Partition pruning / scan optimization fails with IS NOT NULL predicate on PK column KUDU-1651 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1651>: tserver crash when pushing predicate on dict encoded block with all null values 8fc75a5c65 <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/8fc75a5c654e100871316e61878b141df4707d0e>: [java client] Fix an NPE in KuduException 9911c489 <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/9911c489c45b3a261ee50ad1f837387b4953421b> KUDU-1623 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1623>: Properly handle UPSERTS that only include PK column b0b273e8 <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/b0b273e8271752b6eb04ba163981aad1c792e413>: [java client] make DateFormat safe to use 1eb2418 <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/1eb24183a540f4e3bbbc8a399e440ecf905f6129>: consensus: properly truncate all state when aborting operations KUDU-1090 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1090> 4b9d2f6 <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/4b9d2f6976f45ea57e9a2c2648f31b3a0941a569>: relax MemTracker uniqueness constraint It would also be nice to fix the Java client's client2tablet synchronization / memory leak issue, but I'm not sure of the proper set of patches to backport. JD/David, do you have any insight on that? Please reply with any other commits that you would like to include. Most of these issues are extremely rare, or easily worked around (or both), but I think in aggregate they represent enough sharp edges that waiting for a 1.1 release may be painful. Since a few of these issues don't have a patch committed or even in review yet, an RC probably can't be cut before the end of next week (October 7th). I volunteer to RM this one. What does everyone think? - Dan