Reminder that we are going to cut the 1.0.1 RC this Friday. If you have any additional patches you want to include now is the time to speak up. Besides the issues already discussed, the following should make the cut:
KUDU-1660 / 69e657 <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/69e65780843040c085ca34901803b97b59595c0e>: Kudu fails to start up on single CPU system KUDU-1652 part 2 <https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4612/> - Dan On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Dan Burkert <danburk...@apache.org> wrote: > Yep, I can take care of that. > > - Dan > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> Sounds good. Are you going to take care of cherry-picking these items to >> branch-1.0.x? We also need a commit to reset the version in that branch to >> 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT during the dev period. >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Dan Burkert <danburk...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Fixes have landed for KUDU-1651 >> > <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/1f40913de6d3427847f3d435e1b84f >> > b928a6f6a9> >> > and KUDU-1652 >> > <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/ce17a9c4eb34dcfe63c8d4321d38d1 >> > 8a0cb8c5c2>, >> > so every outstanding known issue >> > that we want to address has a committed fix in master. Since many people >> > are >> > otherwise busy with the Strata conference this week, I think we should >> > stick to >> > the original plan to cut an RC on October 7th, with a potential release >> > date the >> > following week. If any further bugs arise before the 7th we can consider >> > them >> > for inclusion. Thanks all. >> > >> > - Dan >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Adar Dembo <a...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> > > +1 to a patch release. >> > > >> > > My only opinion on the nominated patches is that I'm not sure if we >> > > need to include the KUDU-1090 fix. IIRC it was very rare and generally >> > > only contributed to test flakiness. But, I'm fine with including it if >> > > others feel strongly. >> > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> >> wrote: >> > >> +1 for a bug fix release, especially to address the known crash bugs. >> > I'll >> > >> add one more to the running: >> > >> >> > >> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4535/ >> > >> >> > >> This fixes a crash when running on single-core systems. Again not too >> > >> common (even most VMs have two cores these days) but it can be a >> blocker >> > if >> > >> you need to run on a single-core. >> > >> >> > >> -Todd >> > >> >> > >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Dan Burkert <danburk...@apache.org >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi all, >> > >>> >> > >>> Since the 1.0.0 release there have been a few issues found which may >> > >>> warrant a bug fix on the 1.0.x line. I'd like to get the ball >> rolling >> > and >> > >>> figure out what we might want to include in a bug release, if we >> decide >> > to >> > >>> go ahead with a bug release fix. >> > >>> >> > >>> Potential inclusions: >> > >>> >> > >>> KUDU-1652 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1652>: >> Partition >> > >>> pruning / scan optimization fails with IS NOT NULL predicate on PK >> > column >> > >>> KUDU-1651 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1651>: >> tserver >> > crash >> > >>> when pushing predicate on dict encoded block with all null values >> > >>> 8fc75a5c65 >> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/8fc75a5c654e100871316 >> e61878b14 >> > >>> 1df4707d0e>: >> > >>> [java >> > >>> client] Fix an NPE in KuduException >> > >>> 9911c489 >> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/9911c489c45b3a261ee50 >> ad1f83738 >> > >>> 7b4953421b> >> > >>> KUDU-1623 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1623>: >> Properly >> > >>> handle UPSERTS that only include PK column >> > >>> b0b273e8 >> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/b0b273e8271752b6eb04b >> a163981aa >> > >>> d1c792e413>: >> > >>> [java client] make DateFormat safe to use >> > >>> 1eb2418 >> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/1eb24183a540f4e3bbbc8 >> a399e440e >> > >>> cf905f6129>: >> > >>> consensus: properly truncate all state when aborting operations >> > >>> KUDU-1090 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1090> 4b9d2f6 >> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/kudu/commit/4b9d2f6976f45ea57e9a2 >> c2648f31b >> > >>> 3a0941a569>: >> > >>> relax >> > >>> MemTracker uniqueness constraint >> > >>> >> > >>> It would also be nice to fix the Java client's client2tablet >> > >>> synchronization / memory leak issue, but I'm not sure of the proper >> set >> > of >> > >>> patches to backport. JD/David, do you have any insight on that? >> > >>> >> > >>> Please reply with any other commits that you would like to include. >> > >>> >> > >>> Most of these issues are extremely rare, or easily worked around (or >> > both), >> > >>> but I think in aggregate they represent enough sharp edges that >> waiting >> > for >> > >>> a 1.1 release may be painful. >> > >>> >> > >>> Since a few of these issues don't have a patch committed or even in >> > review >> > >>> yet, an RC probably can't be cut before the end of next week >> (October >> > >>> 7th). I volunteer to RM this one. What does everyone think? >> > >>> >> > >>> - Dan >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Todd Lipcon >> > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > >
