> Looking at two of the delta files it seems like they are simply a list > off add-on entries to hunspell. Thus even chrome does not seem to have > the ability to remove/fix misspelled words from the dictionary > content... (unless they get removed by a patch)
Removing misspelled words must always remain under control of dictionary maintainer for obvious reasons. And also the adding of missing words. > As for the .bdic file, I have no idea about that one. ^^° I assume, some internal google format, like aspell's internal format. We can safely ignore that. > I still like the old idea to replace the OOo user-dictionaries by > hunspell dictionaries (or at least a format that hunspell can read). > But that would require hunspell to read 'negative dictionaries' (often > called exception dictionaries) and to provide user-supplied suggestions > for those entries. Hunspell does a good job at suggestions. (I personally never use them, but others, who use them, state the above.) Hunspell does not need any "bad word list" to list the suggestions, it relies on the replacement patterns in the affix file. Could you please give an example, to understand what you mean here? >If we then can also have means for a 'Language All' > dictionary then we could replace the user-dictionaries by hunspell > compatible ones, and that would be a nice thing to do I believe. Please explain, what do you mean with "language all" dictionary, best with some examples. Thanks, eleonora -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
