On 17/02/2009 18:04, Olivier R. wrote:
Hi,

I think the "language all" dictionary will be a nest of issues. :)

In French, we often rename foreign proper names.
You can't be even sure that a company name will be the same.
Vauxhall cars in UK are called Opel in France.

Examples:

London               --> Londres
Frankfurt            --> Francfort
Edinburgh            --> Édimbourg
AIDS                 --> SIDA
Vauxhall             --> Opel
Christopher Columbus --> Christophe Colomb

On the contrary to some others languages, there is no flexions for proper names in French.
For example, there is no 's' at the end of the plural form.
The Edisons          --> les Edison
So, if someone write "les Edisons", the mistake won't be recognized due to this "language all" dictionary, if flexions of proper names are allowed by it.

This "all language" dictionary would probably interfere with others words, and the spellchecker would suggest a wrong spelling for a word similar to thoses in the "all language" dictionary.


I am also afraid it will be an english-american-centered culture dictionary.

In the few examples given, there is already one entry I don't know what it is supposed to be.

What/who is Alva? A skateboarder?


Regards,
Olivier

Most true English people would also object strongly to a "shared" American/English dictionary. We don't have "centers" or "theaters" or "colors" and the metal is not "aluminum". We have "centres", "theatres", "colours" and "aluminium". We don't go "traveling" but "travelling". Before I was born I wasn't a "fetus" but a "foetus". The American versions are just plain wrong in English, not just "acceptable variants". Google finds many lists of differences. As a first example, go to http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwesl/egw/jones/differences.htm

Canadians, Australians and many other "English speaking" countries have their own variations or mixtures. Hence separate Canadian English and Australian English dictionaries for OOo, to mention just two.

I don't know who dreamed up this "all language" dictionary but I think it's one of the most facile, imbecilic ideas I've heard in a very long time. Have the developers nothing better to do with their time?

--
Harold Fuchs
London, England
Please reply *only* to [email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to