Hello Gary,

the errors are in the examples project for .net compact framework (which is no 
longer supported by microsoft):

C:\Users\ggregory\rc\apache-log4net-source-2.0.16\examples\netcf\1.0\Tutorials\ConsoleApp\cs\src\ConsoleApp.csdproj(23,1):
 error MSB4075:
The project file 
"C:\Users\ggregory\rc\apache-log4net-source-2.0.16\examples\netcf\1.0\Tutorials\ConsoleApp\cs\src\ConsoleApp.csdproj"
 must be opened in the Visual Studio IDE and converted to the latest version 
before it can be built by MSBuild.

-> This project file can only be opened by VS 2003.

In the next release we will drop support for those exotic frameworks and delete 
the corresponding examples.
I've already updated all the examples in my feature branch for this.

Regards.

Jan

Thursday, March 7, 2024, 10:28:40 PM, you wrote:

> I've failed to build probably because the machine I am doing this on is DNS 
> locked down for security and can only access certain sites.

> I was able to install install-dotnet-core-sdk-1.1.ps1 but not 
> install-net-framework-sdk-3.5.ps1 (Error 0x800F0954 in a dialog that points 
> to 
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-US/troubleshoot/windows-client/application-management/dotnet-framework-35-installation-error)
>  but I also don't know if how if this machine has enough already on top of 
> Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19045.4046]

> My results: https://paste.apache.org/jj3c8

> I rebooted and tried again with the same results.

> Gary

> On 2024/03/07 03:11:22 Robert Middleton wrote:
>> +1
>> Verified the following:
>> * apache-log4net-source-2.0.16.zip and associated sha/signature
>> * apache-log4net-binaries-2.0.16.zip and associated sha/signature
>> It looks all good to me.
>> -Robert Middleton
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 1:20 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> +1
>>> Verified signatures
>>> Verified hashes
>>> Verified License and Notice files.
>>> Note - the copyright year should be the first year the code was created. 
>>> You can update it to include “-(currentYear}” but that is not strictly 
>>> necessary.
>>> Ralph
>>>> On Mar 4, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Jan Friedrich <freeand...@apache.org> wrote:

>>>> +1
>>>> Unit tests on my machine were successful.
>>>> We integrated the new version into our test environment and all manual 
>>>> tests were successful.
>>>> Jan
>>>>> +1
>>>>> Verified signatures.
>>>>> Verified hashes.
>>>>> `NOTICE` contains 2022 as the copyright year, but I don't find it a
>>>>> blocker. (I have fixed it in `master`.)
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 2:19 PM Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all

>>>>>> This is the vote to release Apache log4net version 2.0.16
>>>>>> Website:
>>>>>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release/release-notes.html
>>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net
>>>>>> GitHub release (pre-release):
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/2.0.16-rc1
>>>>>> Distribution: I'm not sure -
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net should have
>>>>>> 2.0.16 binaries and source (I've added via SVN), but I'm not seeing
>>>>>> them. Any help appreciated.
>>>>>> Please have a look at the staging site & artifacts and test (if you can
>>>>>> - clone, `npm i`, `npm test`)
>>>>>> [ ] +1, release the artifacts
>>>>>> [ ] -1, don't release, because....
>>>>>> (thanks Piotr: I copied most of your last VOTE mail!)
>>>>>> -d

Reply via email to