Process: You need to reply to this thread with a [RESULT] prefix, tally all the votes, and say whether the vote passes or not. It is helpful to note which votes are binding or not.
Gary On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 6:06 AM Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > > Thanks for all the checking - log4net 2.0.16 is out in the wild now (: > > > -d > > On 2024/03/08 00:02, Jan Friedrich wrote: > > Hello Gary, > > > > the errors are in the examples project for .net compact framework (which > is no longer supported by microsoft): > > > > > C:\Users\ggregory\rc\apache-log4net-source-2.0.16\examples\netcf\1.0\Tutorials\ConsoleApp\cs\src\ConsoleApp.csdproj(23,1): > error MSB4075: > > The project file > "C:\Users\ggregory\rc\apache-log4net-source-2.0.16\examples\netcf\1.0\Tutorials\ConsoleApp\cs\src\ConsoleApp.csdproj" > must be opened in the Visual Studio IDE and converted to the latest version > before it can be built by MSBuild. > > > > -> This project file can only be opened by VS 2003. > > > > In the next release we will drop support for those exotic frameworks and > delete the corresponding examples. > > I've already updated all the examples in my feature branch for this. > > > > Regards. > > > > Jan > > > > Thursday, March 7, 2024, 10:28:40 PM, you wrote: > > > >> I've failed to build probably because the machine I am doing this on is > DNS locked down for security and can only access certain sites. > >> I was able to install install-dotnet-core-sdk-1.1.ps1 but not > install-net-framework-sdk-3.5.ps1 (Error 0x800F0954 in a dialog that points > to > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-US/troubleshoot/windows-client/application-management/dotnet-framework-35-installation-error) > but I also don't know if how if this machine has enough already on top of > Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19045.4046] > >> My results: https://paste.apache.org/jj3c8 > >> I rebooted and tried again with the same results. > >> Gary > >> On 2024/03/07 03:11:22 Robert Middleton wrote: > >>> +1 > >>> Verified the following: > >>> * apache-log4net-source-2.0.16.zip and associated sha/signature > >>> * apache-log4net-binaries-2.0.16.zip and associated sha/signature > >>> It looks all good to me. > >>> -Robert Middleton > >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 1:20 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > >>>> +1 > >>>> Verified signatures > >>>> Verified hashes > >>>> Verified License and Notice files. > >>>> Note - the copyright year should be the first year the code was > created. You can update it to include “-(currentYear}” but that is not > strictly necessary. > >>>> Ralph > >>>>> On Mar 4, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Jan Friedrich <freeand...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> Unit tests on my machine were successful. > >>>>> We integrated the new version into our test environment and all > manual tests were successful. > >>>>> Jan > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> Verified signatures. > >>>>>> Verified hashes. > >>>>>> `NOTICE` contains 2022 as the copyright year, but I don't find it a > >>>>>> blocker. (I have fixed it in `master`.) > >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 2:19 PM Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi all > >>>>>>> This is the vote to release Apache log4net version 2.0.16 > >>>>>>> Website: > >>>>>>> > https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release/release-notes.html > >>>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net > >>>>>>> GitHub release (pre-release): > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/2.0.16-rc1 > >>>>>>> Distribution: I'm not sure - > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net should have > >>>>>>> 2.0.16 binaries and source (I've added via SVN), but I'm not seeing > >>>>>>> them. Any help appreciated. > >>>>>>> Please have a look at the staging site & artifacts and test (if > you can > >>>>>>> - clone, `npm i`, `npm test`) > >>>>>>> [ ] +1, release the artifacts > >>>>>>> [ ] -1, don't release, because.... > >>>>>>> (thanks Piotr: I copied most of your last VOTE mail!) > >>>>>>> -d >
