On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So instead of forcing all development to go through stable + trunk, I > propose to go through trunk, and back port to stable only if requested. In > the end we'll be in the same position (trunk having all features) except for > stable which will include just those features of interest to other people. > > I think i sorta disagree with this. I think we should set the Version: in jira appropriately, and if its not risky and won't introduce breaks, try to apply as many issues as possible to both trunk and stable. The reason is: with stable actually being stable, perhaps we could actually get faster releases out this way with solid improvements, while still giving the more complex features the adequate time they need to really bake in trunk. -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
