On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Hi Robert, > > > > My main problem with devleoping new features on trunk first and then > porting by adding backwards cruft is, that you first don’t care with > backwards and then suddenly have to think about it. This may change the API > on trunk again, to get nearer to backwards or maybe because a backwards > layer is not possible. E.g. at the beginning of AttributeSource-TokenStream > API, when Michael and me discussed about the sophisticated® backwards layer, > we also did some changes to the new TokenStream API, to support backwards > better. > I think with this proposal things like sophisticated(R) backwards layers would generally become a thing of the past... -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
