On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 17:00, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> It seems to me that if we have a fix for the things that ail our Maven >> support (Steve's work), that it isn't then the reason for holding up a >> release and we should just keep them as there are a significant number of >> users who consume Lucene that way (via the central repository). I agree >> that we should not switch our build system, but supporting the POMs is no >> different than supporting the IntelliJ/Eclipse generation tools (they are >> both problematic since they are not automated) >> > > its totally different in every way! we don't release the > intellij/eclipse stuff, its for internal use only. > additionally, there are no release artifacts generated by these Latest code from LUCENE-2657 does not generate any new artifacts. It uploads those you already have (built via ant) to the repo.
-- Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (ear...@gmail.com) Phone: +7 (495) 683-567-4 ICQ: 104465785 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
