The main benefit I see is that external contributors would get their name in the commit log.
However on the other hand, I'm a bit annoyed that people easily disagree on the workflow: some people merge into the maintenance branch first and then to master, other people merge into master first and then cherry-pick, other people prefer rebasing instead of merging, etc. I personally don't really care but if we agree on moving to Git, I hope we can agree on the workflow at the same time. At least today with svn we have something simple that everybody agrees on. -0: I'm not against it but Subversion works well for me today. If everybody else agrees on switching to Git I would like us to agree on the workflow as well. -- Adrien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
