Thanks for the info David! I'll likely update version labels and create the 6X branch late tomorrow or early the next day. Let me know if anyone has an issue with this timing.
Thanks, - Nick On Monday, February 29, 2016, david.w.smi...@gmail.com < david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I consider https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7056 (a little > spatail3d reshuffling) blocker before 6.0 as it's the ideal time to move > things around / rename. But I don't mind doing an extra cherry pick in the > end if you want to go create the branch without waiting. So I don't know > if you want to call that a blocker or not. > > Also, FYI there's a feature LUCENE-5735 > (NumberRangePrefixTreeStrategy.calcFacets) that I committed to master (but > not 5x) over a year ago but didn't quite close the issue. I had found a > bug or two but then lost the time to finish it. I'd rather remove this > feature from the 6x branch after you create the branch. When I get more > time (very likely this year) I can resolve the lingering bugs and get it > into whatever 6.x release comes along then. So nothing for you to do here > but wanted to let you know. > > Hey thanks for pitching in to do the release. > > ~ David > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:09 PM Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','nkn...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> Thanks Uwe! Indeed we need branch_6x (and master versions >> changed) first. I'll plan to get that done Monday and/or Tuesday. Let me >> know if there are any blockers and I'll send a note to the list before I >> create the branch. >> >> - Nick >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','u...@thetaphi.de');>> wrote: >> >>> Hi Nicholas, >>> >>> >>> >>> before we start a branch_6_0 we should do the following: >>> >>> >>> >>> - Start branch_6x as “new stable branch” >>> >>> - Update version numbers in “master” to 7.0 >>> >>> >>> >>> This should be done maybe early next week and then after a while that >>> things settle (also the Jenkins Jobs for branch_6x are set up), we can >>> proceed with a gap: >>> >>> - Cut branch_6_0 >>> >>> - Update version numbers in “branch_6x” to 6.1 >>> >>> >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> Uwe Schindler >>> >>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >>> >>> http://www.thetaphi.de >>> >>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Nicholas Knize [mailto:nkn...@gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:23 PM >>> *To:* Lucene/Solr dev <dev@lucene.apache.org> >>> *Subject:* Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 Release Branch >>> >>> >>> >>> With the release of 5.5 and the previous discussion re: 6.0.0 I'd like >>> to keep the ball moving and volunteer as the 6.0.0 RM. >>> >>> >>> >>> If there are no objections my plan is to cut branch_6_0 early next week >>> - Mon or Tues. Please mark blocker issues accordingly and/or let me know if >>> there are any commits needed before cutting the branch. >>> >>> >>> >>> - Nick >>> >> -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >
