Thanks Uwe! On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Will do that! > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* Nicholas Knize [mailto:nkn...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:15 AM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 Release Branch > > > > I created branch_6x and updated the version in master to 7.0.0 but it > looks like I do not have jenkins karma to configure builds for the new 6x > branch. Can someone have a look at configuring the builds? > > > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the info David! > > > > I'll likely update version labels and create the 6X branch late tomorrow > or early the next day. Let me know if anyone has an issue with this timing. > > > > Thanks, > > > > - Nick > > > On Monday, February 29, 2016, david.w.smi...@gmail.com < > david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I consider https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7056 (a little > spatail3d reshuffling) blocker before 6.0 as it's the ideal time to move > things around / rename. But I don't mind doing an extra cherry pick in the > end if you want to go create the branch without waiting. So I don't know > if you want to call that a blocker or not. > > > > Also, FYI there's a feature LUCENE-5735 > (NumberRangePrefixTreeStrategy.calcFacets) that I committed to master (but > not 5x) over a year ago but didn't quite close the issue. I had found a > bug or two but then lost the time to finish it. I'd rather remove this > feature from the 6x branch after you create the branch. When I get more > time (very likely this year) I can resolve the lingering bugs and get it > into whatever 6.x release comes along then. So nothing for you to do here > but wanted to let you know. > > > > Hey thanks for pitching in to do the release. > > > > ~ David > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:09 PM Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Uwe! Indeed we need branch_6x (and master versions changed) first. > I'll plan to get that done Monday and/or Tuesday. Let me know if there are > any blockers and I'll send a note to the list before I create the branch. > > > > - Nick > > > > On Wednesday, February 24, 2016, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > > Hi Nicholas, > > > > before we start a branch_6_0 we should do the following: > > > > - Start branch_6x as “new stable branch” > > - Update version numbers in “master” to 7.0 > > > > This should be done maybe early next week and then after a while that > things settle (also the Jenkins Jobs for branch_6x are set up), we can > proceed with a gap: > > - Cut branch_6_0 > > - Update version numbers in “branch_6x” to 6.1 > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* Nicholas Knize [mailto:nkn...@gmail.com <nkn...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:23 PM > *To:* Lucene/Solr dev <dev@lucene.apache.org> > *Subject:* Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 Release Branch > > > > With the release of 5.5 and the previous discussion re: 6.0.0 I'd like to > keep the ball moving and volunteer as the 6.0.0 RM. > > > > If there are no objections my plan is to cut branch_6_0 early next week - > Mon or Tues. Please mark blocker issues accordingly and/or let me know if > there are any commits needed before cutting the branch. > > > > - Nick > > -- > > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com > > >
