Thanks Nick!

Is it OK if I push LUCENE-7059 (6.0 blocker I opened yesterday)?
Point values issues...

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com


On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I created branch_6x and updated the version in master to 7.0.0 but it looks
> like I do not have jenkins karma to configure builds for the new 6x branch.
> Can someone have a look at configuring the builds?
>
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the info David!
>>
>> I'll likely update version labels and create the 6X branch late tomorrow
>> or early the next day. Let me know if anyone has an issue with this timing.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Nick
>>
>> On Monday, February 29, 2016, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
>> <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I consider https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7056 (a little
>>> spatail3d reshuffling) blocker before 6.0 as it's the ideal time to move
>>> things around / rename.  But I don't mind doing an extra cherry pick in the
>>> end if you want to go create the branch without waiting.  So I don't know if
>>> you want to call that a blocker or not.
>>>
>>> Also, FYI there's a feature LUCENE-5735
>>> (NumberRangePrefixTreeStrategy.calcFacets) that I committed to master (but
>>> not 5x) over a year ago but didn't quite close the issue.  I had found a bug
>>> or two but then lost the time to finish it.   I'd rather remove this feature
>>> from the 6x branch after you create the branch.  When I get more time (very
>>> likely this year) I can resolve the lingering bugs and get it into whatever
>>> 6.x release comes along then.  So nothing for you to do here but wanted to
>>> let you know.
>>>
>>> Hey thanks for pitching in to do the release.
>>>
>>> ~ David
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:09 PM Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Uwe!  Indeed we need branch_6x (and master versions changed)
>>>> first. I'll plan to get that done Monday and/or Tuesday. Let me know if
>>>> there are any blockers and I'll send a note to the list before I create the
>>>> branch.
>>>>
>>>> - Nick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Nicholas,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> before we start a branch_6_0 we should do the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -          Start branch_6x as “new stable branch”
>>>>>
>>>>> -          Update version numbers in “master” to 7.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This should be done maybe early next week and then after a while that
>>>>> things settle (also the Jenkins Jobs for branch_6x are set up), we can
>>>>> proceed with a gap:
>>>>>
>>>>> -          Cut branch_6_0
>>>>>
>>>>> -          Update version numbers in “branch_6x” to 6.1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>>
>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>>
>>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>>
>>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Nicholas Knize [mailto:nkn...@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:23 PM
>>>>> To: Lucene/Solr dev <dev@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 Release Branch
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With the release of 5.5 and the previous discussion re: 6.0.0 I'd like
>>>>> to keep the ball moving and volunteer as the 6.0.0 RM.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If there are no objections my plan is to cut branch_6_0 early next week
>>>>> - Mon or Tues. Please mark blocker issues accordingly and/or let me know 
>>>>> if
>>>>> there are any commits needed before cutting the branch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Nick
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to