First, Nick, thanks for your RM work. > On Mar 3, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The mistake was to freeze the 6x branch in the first place. The release > > branch is the one which should be frozen. > > I certainly agree with this. However, over a week ago there was a request to > hold off on creating the 6_0 branch until Jenkins settled with a 6x. I > received no push back on this suggestion so this was the plan that was > executed (several days after that request was sent). I guess I took this as meaning a freeze on *branch_6x* of hours (acceptable), not days (unacceptable). > I think Mike is suggesting, and I agree with this, there needs to be a > reasonable amount of time given for someone to respond. My impression was that you were intentionally ignoring questions about creation of the 6.0 branch, since there were multiple questions about it from more than one person over a couple days with no response from you, but meanwhile, you responded on other threads. (Sorry, I haven’t gone back and found the exact messages that left me with this impression, so I guess I could be wrong.) One of the RM’s most important responsibilities is timely communication. If you’re going to be AFK for extended periods, please let people know. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
