On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't want to suggest anything to slow down the release... but if > the problems are with the source release, what about just doing a > single source release for lucene+solr? > > We currently have: > > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/ > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/lucene-3.1.0-src.tar.gz > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/... > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/ > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/apache-solr-3.1.0-src.tgz > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/... > > Why not: > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene-3.1.0-src.tar.gz > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/... > lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/... > > and let the src release be as close to svn export as possible? This > will make sure the result builds just as it does when we actually > build it! > > With the maven artifacts, we have source for each jar: > http://people.apache.org/~yonik/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/maven/org/apache/solr/solr-core/3.1.0/solr-core-3.1.0-sources.jar > > http://people.apache.org/~yonik/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/maven/org/apache/lucene/lucene-queries/3.1.0/lucene-queries-3.1.0-sources.jar > > I'm not sure the exact ASF source requirements, but maybe the maven > source.jar files are good enough? >
I don't think someone should have to deal with maven to get the lucene source release... I think lucene should have its own artifacts as in the past (the source code being the most important). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
