On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:27 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> OK, let's vote. My vote: -1 Mine is +1 as long as we mark it as experimental. > > If we resping, can we commit the last changes from branch 3.x that are bugs? I would think so. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:09 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.1 >> >> So, my sense is here that we should fix these minor documentation issues >> and decide on dev-tools and spin a new RC and get this sucker out the > door. >> I think I have some time tomorrow, I can generate the artifacts. >> >> Shall we vote on inclusion of dev-tools? >> >> -Grant >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional >> commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com/ Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
