> > I don't think someone should have to deal with maven to get the lucene > source release... I think lucene should have its own artifacts as in > the past (the source code being the most important). >
sorry, did not mean to muddy the water with maven discussion... ignore my comment when you say "lucene should have its own artifacts" do you mean lucene w/o solr? or could a single source artifact include everything? (making the release process easier and apparently cleaner) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
