Thanks ! Shai
On Friday, April 1, 2011, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> wrote: > Shai, the source jars are available from the maven central repo, e.g.: > > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/3.1.0/lucene-core-3.1.0-sources.jar > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:12 AM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml >> >> Ok, we can keep SNAPSHOT. I was just thinking it'll be nice if the tag >> sets the right version, for convenience. It's not so hard to do. >> >> BTW, I don't build the code, just run jar-src so I can attach the >> source to the jars for debugging purposes. If we had packaged them >> already (not that I propose that we do that), I wouldn't be >> downloading the source at all. >> >> Thanks, >> Shai >> >> On Friday, April 1, 2011, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >> > +1. >> > >> > In all previous releases we were leaving the -dev in the common- >> build.xml, it's simply now -SNAPSHOT. Whenever somebody compiles the code >> himself, there might be changes in it so the reproduced JAR files are not >> identical to the released ones. >> > >> > This was the same for all releases before (at least since 2.9.0 where we >> had the discussion, too). >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > ----- >> > Uwe Schindler >> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> > http://www.thetaphi.de >> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu] >> >> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:19 PM >> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> >> Subject: RE: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml >> >> >> >> Hi Shai, >> >> >> >> On 4/1/2011 at 8:32 AM, Shai Erera wrote: >> >> > Also, the common-build.xml under the tag and the downloaded sources >> >> > specifies version to be 3.1-SNAPSHOT. On the ReleaseTodo I found >> >> > this: "... and the default version in lucene/common-build.xml on the >> >> > branch to X.Y (remove the -SNAPSHOT suffix)", so I guess 'SNAPSHOT' >> >> > should have been removed, but also version should be set to 3.1.0. >> >> >> >> I'm pretty sure the ReleaseTodo page is wrong on this. >> >> >> >> Building from a source distribution should *not* produce artifacts that >> have >> >> the same version in their names as the binary release. We don't want >> same- >> >> version-but-different binary artifacts being accidentally >> produced. There's >> >> nothing stopping people from changing this themselves, of course, so >> leaving >> >> the pre-release version name, including the "-SNAPSHOT" suffix, in the >> >> source release is just a passive defense against this kind of mistake. >> >> >> >> I'll change the ReleaseTodo page if there are no objections. >> >> >> >> Steve >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org