> I'm sorta confused about this (i'll probably offend someone here, but so be > it)
Don't worry > Its hard for me to tell, i hope the reason isn't "elegance", but why aren't > we working on making a simple,supported,80-20 case in lucene that > non-spatial-gurus (and users) understand and can maintain... for me it is all about testing and development. For my needs I can't use the simple stuff, and *need* the features that many users won't care about. I have not done any work on the existing spatial contrib because it does not meet my needs. The code can be separated so that the the dependencies are as you suggest -- i have done this, but it makes testing more difficult and less robust. As part of the framework I've introduced a robust way to use the same data and and tests with different strategies and implementations. For me to work on it, i need the stuff i use to be a first class citizen in testing. ryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
