On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Ryan McKinley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The code can be separated so that the the dependencies are as you >> suggest -- i have done this, but it makes testing more difficult and >> less robust. As part of the framework I've introduced a robust way to >> use the same data and and tests with different strategies and >> implementations. For me to work on it, i need the stuff i use to be a >> first class citizen in testing. >> > > Right, but this creates a problem for our testing too: if we open this > can of worms with optional LGPL stuff I think its going to actually > complicate build and testing. > I already stated my concerns about this here: http://s.apache.org/vE > > I don't think the bdb should be used as justification already that the > "can of worms is already open". Personally I didn't realize the > license it had, and for these same reasons, when i found this out i > put up a patch on Grant's issue. >
I totally agree -- this was my preface to the whole discussion, and why i think it may be more appropriate to move spatial dev to an environment that can have different compile time choices. I'd like to figure a way that this is a win for everyone -- this is why i'm bothering with the prolonged discussion so that at least motivations are clear and all that. ryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
