On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Ryan McKinley <[email protected]> wrote: > > The code can be separated so that the the dependencies are as you > suggest -- i have done this, but it makes testing more difficult and > less robust. As part of the framework I've introduced a robust way to > use the same data and and tests with different strategies and > implementations. For me to work on it, i need the stuff i use to be a > first class citizen in testing. >
Right, but this creates a problem for our testing too: if we open this can of worms with optional LGPL stuff I think its going to actually complicate build and testing. I already stated my concerns about this here: http://s.apache.org/vE I don't think the bdb should be used as justification already that the "can of worms is already open". Personally I didn't realize the license it had, and for these same reasons, when i found this out i put up a patch on Grant's issue. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
