I’m a little tired of re-implementing the patch. I did it for 1.3, 3.x, and 4.x. Perhaps someone more familiar with edismax could take a look.
With the 100X speedup for fuzzy in 4.x, should be widely useful. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:57 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Probably no bribe needed, but an updated patch would be a good start (or will > the 2.5 year old patch still apply and be acceptable as-is?) > > Erik > >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 7:52 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org >> <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>> wrote: >> >> Who do I have to bribe to get SOLR-629 included? >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629> >> >> wunder >> Walter Underwood >> wun...@wunderwood.org <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org> >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ <http://observer.wunderwood.org/> (my blog) >> >> >>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 10:46 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> We have lots of changes, optimizations, bug fixes for 6.6. I'd like to >>> propose a 6.6 release (perhaps the last 6x non-bug-fix release before 7.0 >>> release). >>> >>> I can volunteer to release this, and I can cut the release branch around >>> 4th May, in order to let some time for devs to finish current issues. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ishan >>> >> >
