when Erik mentioned he couldnt get SpanPayloadCheckQuery to work I was about to reply just run that TestCase (until i discovered there wasnt any!)
i'll start the bidding at 1 dinar for TestCase org.apache.lucene.queries.payloads.TestPayloadCheckQuery mod: @org.junit.Test public void testSpanPayloadCheck() throws Exception //now lets test the collectLeaf for query //of course calling Base Class SpanPayloadCheckQuery to construct query log.debug("TestPayloadCheckQuery::testSpanPayloadCheck LINE 257 before query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings, (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1) where postings="+postings); log.debug("TestPayloadCheckQuery::testSpanPayloadCheck LINE 258 before query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings, (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1) where position="+position); log.debug("TestPayloadCheckQuery::testSpanPayloadCheck LINE 259 before query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings, (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1) where term1="+term1); try { //test public void collectLeaf(org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum postings, int position, //org.apache.lucene.index.Term term) throws java.io.IOException { query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings, (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1); } catch(java.io.IOException ioe) { log.error("TestPayloadCheckQuery::testSpanPayloadCheck LINE 264 query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings, (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1) LINE 106 throws IOException ="+ioe.getMessage()); } unless of course anyone has a better idea to test collectLeaf ? Martin ______________________________________________ ________________________________ From: Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:57 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Release 6.6 Probably no bribe needed, but an updated patch would be a good start (or will the 2.5 year old patch still apply and be acceptable as-is?) Erik On Apr 25, 2017, at 7:52 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org<mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>> wrote: Who do I have to bribe to get SOLR-629 included? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629 wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org<mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) On Apr 25, 2017, at 10:46 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com<mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, We have lots of changes, optimizations, bug fixes for 6.6. I'd like to propose a 6.6 release (perhaps the last 6x non-bug-fix release before 7.0 release). I can volunteer to release this, and I can cut the release branch around 4th May, in order to let some time for devs to finish current issues. What do you think? Regards, Ishan