Martin - there is a test class specifically for this query. See the recent
commits I've made to test it further fixing .equals/.hashCode and rewrite.
Can you send your full test code?
Erik
> On Apr 29, 2017, at 07:32, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> when Erik mentioned he couldnt get SpanPayloadCheckQuery to work I was about
> to reply just run that TestCase
> (until i discovered there wasnt any!)
>
>
> i'll start the bidding at 1 dinar for TestCase
> org.apache.lucene.queries.payloads.TestPayloadCheckQuery mod:
>
> @org.junit.Test
> public void testSpanPayloadCheck() throws Exception
>
>
>
> //now lets test the collectLeaf for query
> //of course calling Base Class SpanPayloadCheckQuery to construct query
>
> log.debug("TestPayloadCheckQuery::testSpanPayloadCheck LINE 257 before
> query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings,
> (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1) where
> postings="+postings);
> log.debug("TestPayloadCheckQuery::testSpanPayloadCheck LINE 258 before
> query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings,
> (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1) where
> position="+position);
> log.debug("TestPayloadCheckQuery::testSpanPayloadCheck LINE 259 before
> query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings,
> (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1) where term1="+term1);
>
> try
> { //test public void collectLeaf(org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum
> postings, int position, //org.apache.lucene.index.Term term)
> throws java.io.IOException {
> query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings,
> (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1);
> }
> catch(java.io.IOException ioe) {
> log.error("TestPayloadCheckQuery::testSpanPayloadCheck LINE 264
> query.getPayloadChecker().collectLeaf((org.apache.lucene.index.PostingsEnum)postings,
> (int)position,(org.apache.lucene.index.Term)term1) LINE 106 throws
> IOException ="+ioe.getMessage()); }
>
> unless of course anyone has a better idea to test collectLeaf ?
>
> Martin
> ______________________________________________
>
>
>
> From: Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:57 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Release 6.6
>
> Probably no bribe needed, but an updated patch would be a good start (or will
> the 2.5 year old patch still apply and be acceptable as-is?)
>
> Erik
>
>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 7:52 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
>>
>> Who do I have to bribe to get SOLR-629 included?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629
>>
>> wunder
>> Walter Underwood
>> wun...@wunderwood.org
>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 10:46 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> We have lots of changes, optimizations, bug fixes for 6.6. I'd like to
>>> propose a 6.6 release (perhaps the last 6x non-bug-fix release before 7.0
>>> release).
>>>
>>> I can volunteer to release this, and I can cut the release branch around
>>> 4th May, in order to let some time for devs to finish current issues.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ishan
>>>
>>
>
