David: Well, I can make LUCENE-8048 committable in about 30 seconds ;) On a more serious note, I've already delayed 2 weeks to give people time to respond but nobody has. I'll put some time into digging at why the test failures happened and if they're a test artifact rather than a fundamental problem I'll be more inclined to push forward on it. We'll see what I can find in the next day or two.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:59 AM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doug's issue SOLR-11698 needs my final code review (probably final any way) > and I plan to commit that as late as Monday if it goes well. > > Erick... IMO: > * LUCENE-8048 probably needs some "bake" time IMO, plus it's not clear if > it's committable yet (waiting for other input). > * SOLR-11687 definitely include > > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:41 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> SOLR-11687 and LUCENE-8048 are ones I'd like to consider getting in to >> 7.2, should they have longer to bake though? Any opinions? >> >> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > +1. I have a couple of tickets that I should have wrapped up by Monday. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
