Adrien, If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this significantly reduces the chance of accidental data loss when using MoveReplicaCmd.
> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Quick update: > > LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been merged, they will > be in 7.2. > > LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open. > > LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some cases but I don't > think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to hold the release on it. > > SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it. > > Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > +1 this is over due > > On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ QUEEN VIC) > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137> included in the release. > Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday. > > Christine > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> At: 12/01/17 > 10:11:59 > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2 > Hello, > > It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated a good > set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0. > > There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC: > LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please let > me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the release. > > I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of building the > first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043> >
