Thanks Jan, I see SOLR-14359 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> has already been back ported to branch 8.5, I am ok with SOLR-14317 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> backporting as well. I am planning to build the first RC this coming Wednesday. Let me know if that works for you.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:25 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > Also this coould be a backport candidate: SOLR-14317 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> HttpClusterStateProvider > throws exception when only one node down > > Jan > > 3. apr. 2020 kl. 22:29 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>: > > I plan to merge this to branch_8_5 > > *SOLR-14359 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> Admin > UI has "Select an option" for collections and cores drop-downs* > > Jan > > 3. apr. 2020 kl. 14:15 skrev jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com>: > > +1, thanks Ignacio. > I merged the fix for LUCENE-9300 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9300> and backported to the > 8.5 branch. > > Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 21:48, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> My general take on this is that it's ok to upgrade a dependency in a >> patch release if the dependency upgrade itself is a new patch release of >> the same minor version. The changelog of Tika 1.24 seems to include not >> only bug fixes but also some enhancements[1], so I'd rather do a 8.6 >> release in the near future than backport this dependency upgrade to 8.5. >> >> [1] https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:33 PM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Should we consider backporting SOLR-14367 (the most recent Tika >>> upgrade)? It addresses a CVE in Tika, and while I think we usually avoid >>> changing 3rd party component versions in patch releases, but maybe we >>> should in this case? The upgrade also looks like it was pretty >>> straightforward (drop-in replacement). >>> >>> Cassandra >>> On Apr 2, 2020, 12:47 PM -0500, Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com>, wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The main >>> motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a serious >>> bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via IW#addIndices. >>> >>> If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next week. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Ignacio >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Adrien >> > > >
