If RC1 is released with a non-working SOLR-14359, then please change Solr’s release announcement. Not sure whether the Lucene-bugfix is valid for Solr users, in that case it can be highlighted instead?
Jan > 7. apr. 2020 kl. 10:13 skrev Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com>: > > Here are the drafts for the release notes, let me know if there is something > you wish to change: > > Lucene: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645634&draftShareId=e835ddb5-3bb9-4b33-b6ad-1770e0a95327&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1586247034772 > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645634&draftShareId=e835ddb5-3bb9-4b33-b6ad-1770e0a95327&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1586247034772> > > Solr: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645636&draftShareId=c4a8eb5f-08d0-40db-a877-b94adb383061&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1586247001694 > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645636&draftShareId=c4a8eb5f-08d0-40db-a877-b94adb383061&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1586247001694> > > As I reminder I am planning to build the first RC tomorrow, Wednesday April > 8th. > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com > <mailto:iver...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Thanks Jan, I see SOLR-14359 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> has already been back > ported to branch 8.5, I am ok with SOLR-14317 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> backporting as well. I am > planning to build the first RC this coming Wednesday. Let me know if that > works for you. > > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:25 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com > <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>> wrote: > Also this coould be a backport candidate: SOLR-14317 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> HttpClusterStateProvider > throws exception when only one node down > > Jan > >> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 22:29 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com >> <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>>: >> >> I plan to merge this to branch_8_5 >> >> SOLR-14359 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> Admin UI >> has "Select an option" for collections and cores drop-downs >> >> Jan >> >>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 14:15 skrev jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:jim.feren...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> +1, thanks Ignacio. >>> I merged the fix for LUCENE-9300 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9300> and backported to the >>> 8.5 branch. >>> >>> Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 21:48, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >>> My general take on this is that it's ok to upgrade a dependency in a patch >>> release if the dependency upgrade itself is a new patch release of the same >>> minor version. The changelog of Tika 1.24 seems to include not only bug >>> fixes but also some enhancements[1], so I'd rather do a 8.6 release in the >>> near future than backport this dependency upgrade to 8.5. >>> >>> [1] https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html >>> <https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html> >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:33 PM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> Should we consider backporting SOLR-14367 (the most recent Tika upgrade)? >>> It addresses a CVE in Tika, and while I think we usually avoid changing 3rd >>> party component versions in patch releases, but maybe we should in this >>> case? The upgrade also looks like it was pretty straightforward (drop-in >>> replacement). >>> >>> Cassandra >>> On Apr 2, 2020, 12:47 PM -0500, Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:iver...@gmail.com>>, wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The main >>>> motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a serious >>>> bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via >>>> IW#addIndices. >>>> >>>> If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next week. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Ignacio >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Adrien >> >
