Hi all, 8.6 RC is planned tomorrow but there are still 9 Jira issues unresolved for 8.6 (+ private ones?)
Please review and update their status. 3 blockers SOLR-14599 Introduce cluster level plugins through packages SOLR-14593 Package store API to disable file upload over HTTP SOLR-14580 CloudSolrClient cannot be initialized using 'zkHosts' builder Other SOLR-14590 Add support for FeatureField in Solr SOLR-14516 NPE during Realtime GET SOLR-14422 Solr 8.5 Admin UI shows Angular placeholders on first load / refresh SOLR-14398 package store PUT should be idempotent SOLR-14311 Shared schema should not have access to core level classes LUCENE-9356 Add tests for corruptions caused by byte flips Le dim. 5 juil. 2020 à 08:10, David Smiley <[email protected]> a écrit : > Pertaining to the highlighter performance regression: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14628 > It's a simple change in a default setting, that is furthermore consistent > with how the behavior was prior to Solr 8.5 > > I'm hoping this can make it into the release? See the PR. > > ~ David > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:05 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks starting this discussion, Cassandra. >> >> I reviewed the issues I was involved with and I don't quite see something >> worth noting. >> >> I plan to add a note about a change in defaults within UnifiedHighlighter >> that could be a significant perf regression. This wasn't introduced in 8.6 >> but introduced in 8.5 and it's significant enough to bring attention to. I >> could add it in 8.5's section but then add a short pointer to it in 8.6. >> >> ~ David >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:52 PM Cassandra Targett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I started looking at the Ref Guide for 8.6 to get it ready, and notice >>> there are no Upgrade Notes in `solr-upgrade-notes.adoc` for 8.6. Is it >>> really true that none are needed at all? >>> >>> I’ll add what I usually do about new features/changes that maybe >>> wouldn’t normally make the old Upgrade Notes section, I just find it >>> surprising that there weren’t any devs who thought any of the 100 or so >>> Solr changes warrant any user caveats. >>> On Jun 17, 2020, 12:27 PM -0500, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < >>> [email protected]>, wrote: >>> >>> +1. Thanks Bruno >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:22 AM Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> The release wizard python script should be sufficient for everything. >>>> If you run into any issues with it, let me know, I used it for 8.5.2 and >>>> think I understand it pretty well. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:31 AM Bruno Roustant < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> It’s been a while since we released Lucene/Solr 8.5. >>>>> I’d like to volunteer to be a release manager for an 8.6 release. If >>>>> there's agreement, then I plan to cut the release branch two weeks today, >>>>> on June 30th, and then to build the first RC two days later. >>>>> >>>>> This will be my first time as release manager so I'll probably need >>>>> some guidance. Currently I have two resource links on this subject: >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseTodo >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master/dev-tools/scripts#releasewizardpy >>>>> If you have more, please share with me. >>>>> >>>>> Bruno >>>>> >>>>
