Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the upgrade notes for the
autoscaling stuff anyways.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote:

> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs that I didn't
> actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had intended to verify
> that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). Doing that now, and suspect
> that we probably want to include it for 8.6.1
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded?
>>
>> Looking at
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90
>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut to fix this issue.
>>>
>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next week I'm going to
>>> push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits reverted and some
>>> additional documentation on reverting the defaulted autoscaling policy from
>>> 8.6.0.
>>>
>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1.
>>>
>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement.
>>>
>>> - Houston
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in doing so because
>>>> Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought it would be better
>>>> if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them of the issue right away
>>>> anyway.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying of the issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I volunteer to do
>>>>>> the release.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if users have to take
>>>>>> an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most users haven't 
>>>>>> upgraded
>>>>>> to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we will make life easier for
>>>>>> everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is released.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users upgrading from 8.6
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy?
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > +1
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch added a default
>>>>>> autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and then 8.6.1, does the
>>>>>> default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? If so we 
>>>>>> probably
>>>>>> want to include instructions in the release notes on how to fix this 
>>>>>> issue
>>>>>> once upgrading.
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > - Houston
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> Hi,
>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression identified in 8.6.0
>>>>>> release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious enough to warrant an
>>>>>> immediate bug fix release.
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, I'll be unable to
>>>>>> volunteer for this release owning to some other commitments, however
>>>>>> Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able to volunteer for this 
>>>>>> post
>>>>>> 27th.
>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding this?
>>>>>> >> > >> Regards,
>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > --
>>>>>> >> > Regards,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Atri
>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>> >> Regards,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Atri
>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Atri
>>>>>> Apache Concerted
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>

Reply via email to