8x docs not building smoothly on my laptop... (without changes) troubleshooting, checking deps listed in README.adoc, etc.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the upgrade notes for the > autoscaling stuff anyways. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs that I didn't >> actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had intended to verify >> that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). Doing that now, and suspect >> that we probably want to include it for 8.6.1 >> >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? >>> >>> Looking at >>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90 >>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut to fix this >>>> issue. >>>> >>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next week I'm going to >>>> push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits reverted and some >>>> additional documentation on reverting the defaulted autoscaling policy from >>>> 8.6.0. >>>> >>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1. >>>> >>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement. >>>> >>>> - Houston >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in doing so because >>>>> Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought it would be better >>>>> if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them of the issue right away >>>>> anyway. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying of the issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I volunteer to do >>>>>>> the release. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if users have to >>>>>>> take an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most users haven't >>>>>>> upgraded to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we will make life >>>>>>> easier >>>>>>> for everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is released. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users upgrading from >>>>>>> 8.6 to >>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy? >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > +1 >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch added a default >>>>>>> autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and then 8.6.1, does the >>>>>>> default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? If so we >>>>>>> probably >>>>>>> want to include instructions in the release notes on how to fix this >>>>>>> issue >>>>>>> once upgrading. >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > - Houston >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> Hi, >>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression identified in 8.6.0 >>>>>>> release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious enough to warrant an >>>>>>> immediate bug fix release. >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, I'll be unable to >>>>>>> volunteer for this release owning to some other commitments, however >>>>>>> Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able to volunteer for this >>>>>>> post >>>>>>> 27th. >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding this? >>>>>>> >> > >> Regards, >>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>>> >> > Regards, >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Atri >>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>> >> Regards, >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Atri >>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Atri >>>>>>> Apache Concerted >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >> > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) http://www.the111shift.com (play)
