Ishan suggested I also supply the slight clarification to ref guide build docs to 8_6 https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1704 if you want to include it.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:25 PM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote: > Both of those look good to include! > > Ill keep an eye out for when they get resolved. > > - Houston > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:16 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Can we include SOLR-11611 for 8.6.1? The patch should be simple to test >> out (with someone having a Windows machine and VM) and seems like a good >> one to fix. >> I marked it as a 8.6.1 bug, but please feel free to unmark it (or I can >> do so, if you tell me to) if you feel otherwise. >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Came back from holiday and fixed >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14671 >>> Can we include it in 8.6.1? >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> 27. jul. 2020 kl. 22:56 skrev Houston Putman <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Added upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff. >>> >>> Will begin the release process tomorrow when my GPG Keys will be >>> refreshed in all of the apache systems. >>> >>> - Houston >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Doc changes are in. Still having trouble with that one link in 8x but >>>> just fixed it locally and made sure not to push that change. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 8x docs not building smoothly on my laptop... (without changes) >>>>> troubleshooting, checking deps listed in README.adoc, etc. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM Houston Putman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the upgrade notes for >>>>>> the autoscaling stuff anyways. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs that I didn't >>>>>>> actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had intended to >>>>>>> verify >>>>>>> that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). Doing that now, and suspect >>>>>>> that we probably want to include it for 8.6.1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looking at >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90 >>>>>>>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut to fix this >>>>>>>>> issue. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next week I'm >>>>>>>>> going to push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits reverted >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> some additional documentation on reverting the defaulted autoscaling >>>>>>>>> policy >>>>>>>>> from 8.6.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in doing so >>>>>>>>>> because Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought it >>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>> better if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them of the >>>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>> right away anyway. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying of the issue? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> a >>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I volunteer >>>>>>>>>>>> to do the release. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if users have >>>>>>>>>>>> to take an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most users >>>>>>>>>>>> haven't >>>>>>>>>>>> upgraded to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we will make >>>>>>>>>>>> life easier >>>>>>>>>>>> for everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is released. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email. >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users upgrading >>>>>>>>>>>> from 8.6 to >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy? >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > +1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch added a >>>>>>>>>>>> default autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and then >>>>>>>>>>>> 8.6.1, does >>>>>>>>>>>> the default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? If so >>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>> probably want to include instructions in the release notes on how >>>>>>>>>>>> to fix >>>>>>>>>>>> this issue once upgrading. >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > - Houston >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression identified in 8.6.0 >>>>>>>>>>>> release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious enough to warrant >>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>> immediate bug fix release. >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, I'll be >>>>>>>>>>>> unable to volunteer for this release owning to some other >>>>>>>>>>>> commitments, >>>>>>>>>>>> however Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able to >>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer for >>>>>>>>>>>> this post 27th. >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding this? >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Atri >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> >> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> Atri >>>>>>>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Atri >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>> >>> >>> -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) http://www.the111shift.com (play)
