Erick, I'll answer your questions shortly. On Sun, 4 Oct, 2020, 10:33 am Ishan Chattopadhyaya, < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agree, Noble. Let's not worry about the naming too much. We can discuss > that later as well, or in a separate thread. > > On Sun, 4 Oct, 2020, 10:06 am Noble Paul, <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 Ishan >> >> It's important that the branch gets some real world testing and >> feedback. At this point we cannot be 100% sure about the stability of >> that branch to port all the changes to master. >> >> Users don't care what is Solr 9/Solr 10 or even Mark's Solr or even a >> "Crazy Solr". As long as all the tests pass and they can do an upgrade >> of their existing cluster to that release,that IS Solr. I think we do >> not need to worry too much about it now. If/when we reach a point >> where we have a new stable release of Solr that is 100% compatible >> with our other branch, we can resume this discussion. >> >> As Ilan said, we may get real feedback from our users deploying it on >> production scale but non critical deployments. Our JUnit tests are not >> good enough to uncover stability issues. >> >> Let's focus on making all the tests pass and get this to the hands of our >> users. >> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 8:01 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >> > >> > Is the branch ready for Jenkins testing? >> > >> > If yes and "gradlew check" works, I really would like to set it up. >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > Am October 3, 2020 7:42:22 PM UTC schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> >> Hi Devs, >> >> >> >> As you might be aware, the reference_impl branch has a lot of >> improvements that we want to see in Solr master. However, it is currently a >> large deviation from master and hence the stability and reliability (though >> improved in certain aspects) remains to be tested in real production >> environments before we gain confidence in bringing those changes to master. >> >> >> >> I propose that we do a one off preview release from that branch, say >> Solr 10 alpha (early access) or any other name that someone suggests, so >> that users could try it out and report regressions or improvements etc. >> >> >> >> I volunteer to be the RM and planning to start the process around 1 >> December-15 December timeframe. Until then, we can tighten the loose ends >> on the branch and plan for such a release. >> >> >> >> Is there any thoughts, concerns, questions? >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Ishan >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Uwe Schindler >> > Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen >> > https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------------- >> Noble Paul >> >
