FWIW, I'm not really in favor of the convention Lucene adopted. I probably
lost track of the debate and failed to object which is on me, but I guess
it was because that was the lower number of changes there? It's
certainly much less legible in the IDE to have a wall of classes all
starting with T. Maybe given that the projects are splitting Solr can Stick
with FooTest not TestFoo? I think *Test suffix is more common in Solr...
(though I haven't attempted to quantify it)

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:05 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
wrote:

> Makes sense to me.
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2021, at 2:42 PM, Marcus Eagan <marcusea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Lucene’s standardization is complete and I believe enforced,
> should we discuss if we could bring the same consistency to Solr?
>
> Best,
>
> Marcus
> --
> Marcus Eagan
>
>
> _______________________
> *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467
> | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
> <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> of whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>

-- 
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)

Reply via email to