FWIW, I'm not really in favor of the convention Lucene adopted. I probably lost track of the debate and failed to object which is on me, but I guess it was because that was the lower number of changes there? It's certainly much less legible in the IDE to have a wall of classes all starting with T. Maybe given that the projects are splitting Solr can Stick with FooTest not TestFoo? I think *Test suffix is more common in Solr... (though I haven't attempted to quantify it)
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:05 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > Makes sense to me. > > > On Feb 20, 2021, at 2:42 PM, Marcus Eagan <marcusea...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Now that Lucene’s standardization is complete and I believe enforced, > should we discuss if we could bring the same consistency to Solr? > > Best, > > Marcus > -- > Marcus Eagan > > > _______________________ > *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 > | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy > <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed > <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless > of whether attachments are marked as such. > > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) http://www.the111shift.com (play)