[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13252486#comment-13252486
 ] 

Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3972:
-------------------------------------

Hmmm... it's not collisions then, it was worth a try. I still find the 
difference puzzling -- I can't justify your version being 3x faster. Curious 
what it might be.

bq. But we know a lot about docids, and extra hashing should just lead to an 
average-case slowdown.

Ok.
                
> Improve AllGroupsCollector implementations
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3972
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3972
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/grouping
>            Reporter: Martijn van Groningen
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3972.patch, LUCENE-3972.patch
>
>
> I think that the performance of TermAllGroupsCollectorm, 
> DVAllGroupsCollector.BR and DVAllGroupsCollector.SortedBR can be improved by 
> using BytesRefHash to store the groups instead of an ArrayList.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to