[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13295025#comment-13295025 ]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-3534: ------------------------------------ Just to keep these concerns separated, this issue, SOLR-3534 is about two things: * dismax&edismax should look at 'df' before falling back to defaultSearchField * dismax&edismax should throw an exception if neither 'qf', 'df', nor defaultSearchField are specified, because these two query parsers are fairly useless without them. SOLR-2724 is about the deprecation of defaultSearchField > dismax and edismax should default to "df" when "qf" is absent. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3534 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query parsers > Affects Versions: 4.0 > Reporter: David Smiley > Assignee: David Smiley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: > SOLR-3534_dismax_and_edismax_should_default_to_df_if_qf_is_absent.patch > > > The dismax and edismax query parsers should default to "df" when the "qf" > parameter is absent. They only use the defaultSearchField in schema.xml as a > fallback now. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org