[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13295296#comment-13295296
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-3534:
------------------------------------

Hoss, I like your suggestion of refactoring this to SolrPluginUtils (not *Tools 
which doesn't exist).  And also I realized that SolrParams.get() takes a 2nd 
arg for the default which can be s.getDefaultSearchFieldName(), simplifying 
this even more.

bq. As Bernd noted, that test was written at a time when the schema.xml used by 
the test had a <defaultSearchField/> declared – that was/is the entire point of 
the test: that the Dismax(Handler|QParser) could work with a 
"<defaultSearchField/>" and a "q" and no other params specified. As long as 
"<defaultSearchField/>" is legal (even if it's deprecated and not mentioned in 
the example schema.xml) a test like that should exist somewhere shouldn't it? 
(if/when "<defaultSearchField/>" is no longer legal, then certainly change the 
test to add a "df" param and assert that it fails if one isn't specified)

I'm confused by this, especially since you "+1"'ed on throwing an exception.  
I'll presume that you don't mean "<defaultSearchField/>" literally, you mean 
"<defaultSearchField>text</defaultSearchField/>".  So are you effectively 
saying that schema-minimal.xml should add a defaultSearchField to it?
                
> dismax and edismax should default to "df" when "qf" is absent.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: query parsers
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 
> SOLR-3534_dismax_and_edismax_should_default_to_df_if_qf_is_absent.patch
>
>
> The dismax and edismax query parsers should default to "df" when the "qf" 
> parameter is absent.  They only use the defaultSearchField in schema.xml as a 
> fallback now.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to