[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13294811#comment-13294811
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-3534:
------------------------------------
I ran all tests before committing and found the MinimalSchemaTest failed
related to the "dismaxNoDefaults" request handler in the test solrconfig.xml
which was added in SOLR-1776. The problem is throwing an exception if there's
no 'qf', 'df', or default search field. I disagree with that test -- it is
erroneous/misleading to use dismax without setting any default field. I am
inclined to delete the "dismaxNoDefaults" test request handler (assuming there
are no other ramifications). I want to get input from Hoss who put it there so
I'll wait.
> dismax and edismax should default to "df" when "qf" is absent.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query parsers
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments:
> SOLR-3534_dismax_and_edismax_should_default_to_df_if_qf_is_absent.patch
>
>
> The dismax and edismax query parsers should default to "df" when the "qf"
> parameter is absent. They only use the defaultSearchField in schema.xml as a
> fallback now.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
