[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13295900#comment-13295900
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-3534:
--------------------------------------
I think it would be helpful to users and ease the support burden if we added a
warning to the comment for <defaultSchemaField> (whether deprecated or not)
that says "WARNING: The "df" request parameter, including the default in any
query request handlers, overide this default. So, be sure to review how "df"
may be used for relevant request handlers before specifying a last-resort
default search field here."
Similar wording should be included in SOLR-2724.
> dismax and edismax should default to "df" when "qf" is absent.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query parsers
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments:
> SOLR-3534_dismax_and_edismax_should_default_to_df_if_qf_is_absent.patch,
> SOLR-3534_dismax_and_edismax_should_default_to_df_if_qf_is_absent.patch
>
>
> The dismax and edismax query parsers should default to "df" when the "qf"
> parameter is absent. They only use the defaultSearchField in schema.xml as a
> fallback now.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
