[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13295310#comment-13295310 ]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3534: -------------------------------- The point of the test is to assert that DismaxQParser can function correctly with nothing but a "q" param and a schema specifying a defaultSearchField. If that's covered by another test you're adding (or that already exists) then great, we don't need it. > dismax and edismax should default to "df" when "qf" is absent. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3534 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query parsers > Affects Versions: 4.0 > Reporter: David Smiley > Assignee: David Smiley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: > SOLR-3534_dismax_and_edismax_should_default_to_df_if_qf_is_absent.patch > > > The dismax and edismax query parsers should default to "df" when the "qf" > parameter is absent. They only use the defaultSearchField in schema.xml as a > fallback now. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org