[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13464027#comment-13464027
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4399:
-------------------------------------
I feel like the safety might be a good idea (even though I hate the idea of
doing it now).
Would be good to see what anyone else thinks about this.
I don't like that the Codec check is currently "false sense of security" if we
change BlockTree.
> Rename AppendingCodec to Appending40Codec
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4399
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4399
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4399.patch, LUCENE-4399.patch
>
>
> In order AppendingCodec to follow Lucene codecs version, I think its name
> should include a version number (so that, for example, if we get to releave
> Lucene 4.3 with a new Lucene43Codec, there will also be a new
> Appending43Codec).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
